Out of Work // Out of Control

Volume 5, Issue 18
April 16, 2020

The architect is stuck doing work they don’t love. The office gives them okay wages for each week of labor they sell, working away on RCPs that position the ceiling tiles just so to make the steelwork, the ductwork, the electrical work all disappear. What remains is a grid of neat lines that look like no work at all. The architect loves the work of select individuals, these magicians that leverage their past work on corporate headquarters toward the procurement of institutional projects funded by those same corporations’ CEOs. This star designer probably met the CEO at a distant relative’s gala, the architect reassures themself. Meanwhile, the architect is still stuck in the office at 10pm on a Friday night. No overtime, I’m afraid. We can’t afford to bill those added hours.

The architect is stuck: just as we sell our labor for increasingly meager wages, we continue to create documents of control that define the wage-labor of others. Not only does the architect control the immediate labor of construction, but Architecture—here defined as the unexceptional labor done by architects-at-large—is nearly always put forward to expand the profit margins of those able to mobilize large quantities of capital. The reduction of the once-bourgeois position of the architect to the “working class” makes those architects who yet move in the old paradigm appear as class traitors.

The emancipation of the architect from the precarity imposed by wage-slavery, we have called Out of Work.

The emancipation of the victims of architecture from the products of our captive labor, we have called Out of Control.

Out of Work asks us to examine the processes which determine the architect’s position within neoliberal ideologies of performance, austerity, and market value.

Out of Control asks us to investigate architecture’s output—typically the beautified commodities that enable oppressive and inequitable social arrangements.

We believe these issues to be linked. This fold, a provisional attempt at escapism—though, an escapism concerned with the ground, as opposed to the clouds—aims to elucidate the qualities of this double-bind and seek strategies for a way out.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14gz4tv_GVKOuDjyHSkmqyLJUE1X3bUPA6oK9JI5_pG0/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FVSkgLTsqXVnkn8rncJ7R-tz2N8VYyQxyxhhin36Xig/edit?usp=sharing

Fold Viewer

Volume 5, Issue 18
April 16, 2020

Related Folds

Volume 5, Issue 19
April 23, 2020
Volume 5, Issue 07
April 13, 2020

More by Fold Editors

4 Folds

The Architectural Gaze Goes Clubbing

Volume 5, Issue 02
September 12, 2019

Ends of Architecture

Volume 4, Issue 17
April 18, 2019

Cite Analysis

Volume 4, Issue 12
February 21, 2019

Internal Memo

Volume 4, Issue 00
August 30, 2018

More by Graphic Designers

6 Folds

Dispatch 03

Volume 6, Issue 00
April 30, 2021

Graphic Designers

Fashion

Volume 6, Issue 12
April 28, 2021

Graphic Designers

Essential

Volume 6, Issue 06
November 12, 2020

Graphic Designers

In Solidarity

Volume 6, Issue 04
October 29, 2020

Graphic Designers

Default

Volume 6, Issue 01
September 17, 2020

Graphic Designers

The Architectural Gaze Goes Clubbing

Volume 5, Issue 02
September 12, 2019

Graphic Designers